Sunday, July 26, 2020

University Versus College Degrees

University Versus College Degrees The OE Blog As students across the country prepare to make decisions about which UK University to apply to, the government’s plans for higher education remain in a shambles. With tuition fees at the top level of £9000 set to be charged by the vast majority of top UK Universities, it has now been suggested that cheaper places will be available for degree courses at community and sixth form colleges. Will these courses, often vocational and specifically designed to lead immediately into employment upon graduation, provide much better value for money, or will they be seen as a poorer quality alternative, less respected as a qualification in the world of work? Is College better value? This week the BBC interviewed staff and students at Bradford College, where a wide variety of courses are available at a cost of £6700 per year, compared to the £8500 tuition fees at Leeds Metropolitan University (the institution that validates the College’s degrees). Compared to the University, Bradford College offers a much greater number of specifically vocational courses, from hairdressing and beauty therapy to ophthalmic dispensing, catering and hospitality. Degree student Simon Hinken claimed his college provided much better value for money than university, and pointed out that “you get a lot more contact time” due to smaller class sizes and student numbers. Certainly many would argue that in this age of enormous tuition fees and huge graduate debts, to take a course that might lead immediately into employment, at a cost that will leave you with less debt to pay off, is by far the cleverest option for today’s students. A two-tier education system? But those in opposition to the government’s higher education scheme have claimed that this provision of cheaper degrees at less respected institutions risks causing a return to the old class-based university system, where the rich paid for impressive degrees from the best universities whilst the poor had to put up with polytechnic education and were then punished for it when their degree had less ‘value’ in the job marketplace. If the degrees provided by colleges were held in lower esteem than university qualifications by employers, then this certainly might become a huge social problem. Is higher education worth it at all? In the meantime, many high-profile business leaders such as Jill McDonald, UK boss of burger chain McDonald’s, are urging businesses to look beyond traditional graduate recruitment. She believes that school leavers should be brave about going straight into employment without gaining a degree first at all. McDonald argues that over half of the McDonald’s executive team started out working in one of their restaurants, and suggests that an expensive degree is not necessary to go far in the world of employment. She told the Institute of Directors Annual Conference: “we need to acknowledge the road many young people take today may not be the one we took in the past”. Whats the answer? So, amidst the chaos of tuition fees, grants, bursaries, universities and colleges, what on earth is the answer? Is it best to go all out for a top university degree, regardless of the £40,000 price tag, on the basis that the impressive qualification will guarantee you much higher earning power in the long run? Is it better to plump for a cheaper qualification from a less well-known college in the hope that having a more vocational degree will still get you into a good job, but without the same level of debt? Or is the answer simply to eschew further education altogether and jump straight into the world of work three years and several thousand pounds ahead of your university-attending counterparts? At this stage, the only thing that’s certain is that this generation of teenagers has far more difficult and complex decisions to make about its future than ever before.

Friday, May 22, 2020

Struggles and Setbacks of Developing Democracies in Latin...

The concept of patrimonialism in Latin American countries is a subject that has been studied and researched by some of the world’s most renowned sociologists and political scientists. In this literature review I will use the information gathered from several of these researchers and combine their theories and ideologies in an attempt to understand why many Latin American countries such as Mexico, Argentina, Venezuela, and Bolivia have continued to remain oppressed throughout history and stand on a slippery slope towards democratic reform of their national governments. The impeded development of democracy in these countries is much derived from Spanish empirical forms, reigning from the colonial era in which Spanish conquistadores†¦show more content†¦Evaluating progress from an economic standpoint In order to successfully evaluate the transition of an authoritarian regime towards a more democratic form of government, we would not only look at the implications of power and rule of government policy, but as well the economic values of these authoritarian states, in doing this we could find that the abuse of government resources and funding are extremely detrimental to the democratic progress, in which the question could be asked, what are some of the main economic mechanisms causing the deprivation of economic growth in these authoritarian states? The suboptimal economic growth in Latin America suggests that even after open-market policies have been implemented; Latin Americas share in world output has remained stagnant at roughly 6% since the 1970’s. Some experts have suggested that corruption, excessive debt, political instability, low investment in human capital, and emigration account for low levels of economic prosperity in Latin America (Lizardo, R. Mollack, A. V. 2009). The findings of this study would lead us to believe that these detrimental governmental actions would appeal to the school of thought aforementioned, in where the leader of a state is placing his priorities above those of the citizens of the state. The states control over economic earnings, and over-abusive consumption contributes to the negative growth economically, of these states,Show MoreRelatedEssay on Motivations and Causes of Terrorism3275 Words   |  14 PagesMotivations and Causes of Terrorism Despite the end of the Cold War and the faltering beginnings of a peace process in the Middle East, terrorism still remains a serious threat in many countries, not surprisingly, given that the underlying causes of the bitter ethnic and religious struggles which spawn terrorism pre-dated the Cold War, and most of these conflicts remain unresolved. While the former Soviet Union sponsored terrorism on an opportunistic basis, the idea that all internationalRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesand Paul Buhle, eds., The New Left Revisited David M. Scobey, Empire City: The Making and Meaning of the New York City Landscape Gerda Lerner, Fireweed: A Political Autobiography Allida M. Black, ed., Modern American Queer History Eric Sandweiss, St. Louis: The Evolution of an American Urban Landscape Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past Sharon Hartman Strom, Political Woman: Florence Luscomb and the Legacy of Radical Reform Read MoreInternational Management67196 Words   |  269 Pageseconomies. Most countries and regions around the world are inextricably linked, yet profound differences in institutional and cultural environments persist. The challenges for international management reflect this dynamism and the increasing unpredictability of global economic and political events. Continued growth of the emerging markets is reshaping the global balance of economic power. Many emerging markets continued to experience growth during a period in which developed countries saw their economiesRead MoreCritical Analysis of New Indian Economic Policy5290 Words   |  22 Pagesof India as per the GDP is the eleventh largest economy in the world and by purchasing power parity the fourth largest. Following strong economic reforms from the socialist inspired economy of Indian nation before the time of independence, the country began to develop a fast-paced economic growth, as free market principles were initiated in 1990 for international competition and foreign investment. India is an emerging economic power with a very large amount resources both natural and human resourceRead MoreIndividual Privacy vs National Security5833 Words   |  24 Pagesprocreation, marriage, and termination of medical treatment. Polls show most Americans support this broader reading of the Constitution, (Linder 2012b). Looking forward under this decision, each citizen relies on its government to maintain a fair level of protection and security as well as maintaining a balanced level of privacy. The justification for this claim shows how the rights of individuals is a must, within the American society, compared to the national security of the country’s territory andRead MoreDubais Political and Economic Development: Essay38738 Words   |  155 Pagesmake money. Although lowpaying jobs hammering steel and cleaning floors may not sound very appealing, they attract numerou s Indian and Pakistani workers because they can make more money performing these tasks in Dubai than they can in their home countries, where jobs of any kind are often ~ c a r c e Similarly, Westerners who work in management positions for .~ multinationals corporations located in Dubai s free trade zones are lured by financial incentives such as high wages and tax breaks. As oneRead More65 Successful Harvard Business School Application Essays 2nd Edition 147256 Words   |  190 Pages.Olivier Boureau Jason Bohle 97 99 101 104 106 V. three accomplishments Anonymous Anonymous Martin Brand Anonymous Anonymous Scott Griffin Daniel Lewis 113 117 121 124 128 132 136 vi Contents Dale Schilling Erik Johnson 140 143 Vi. setback or failUre Chris Withers Eugenia Gibbons John Richard Craig Ellis Irfhan Rawji Thomson Nguy Anonymous Jordan Burton 150 152 154 157 159 161 163 165 Vii. ethical issUes Anonymous PaulYeh Rye Barcott Anonymous Adam Heltzer Anonymous Anonymous 171Read MoreRisk Mitigation Using Joint Venture Agreement in the Upstream Petroleum Industry15328 Words   |  62 PagesBASIN BLOCK 16: AN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION JOINT VENTURE† 2.11.1 Structure of the Joint Venture 2.11.2 Venture related Risks 2.11.3 Exploration amp; Production/ Conoco Corporation’s Withdrawal 2.11.4 Economic, Financial amp; Political Setbacks 2.11.5 YPF South America Intervention 2.11.6 Learning Highlights Chapter 3 Data, Methodology amp; Modelling 3.1 Introduction 3.2 General Parameters 3.3 Field Parameters 3.4 Methodology 3.4.1 Scenario 1 (NOC amp; Investor) 3.4.2 Read MoreManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 Pagesservice purchase, he or she tells six other potential buyers. In contrast, a dissatisfied consumer informs 25 other potential buyers. That is the leverage of quality in shaping consumer sentiment, which is vital in powering the two-thirds of the American economy that is consumer-driven. Therefore, as companies again go back to the business basics, this is a reminder of the most fundamental of those basics: Company managers need to recognize that a business’s income comes from its customers, not fromRead MoreExploring Corporate Strategy - Case164366 Words   |  658 PagesIndustry – global forces at work in the ethical pharmaceutical industry. TUI – competitive forces in the travel industry. HiFi – how can small players survive changing markets? Amazon (B) – latest developments in a successful dot.com. Formula One – developing the capabilities for competitive success in a hi-tech industry. Manchester United – clash of expectations in the football world. Salvation Army – strategic challenges for a global not-for-profit organisation with a mission. Bayer MS – corporate

Friday, May 8, 2020

Outline Of Grendel And The Green Knight - 1013 Words

Outline Grendel and the Green Knight I. Introduction II. Grendel’s Malicious Ways a. Why He Does What He Does b. Grendel’s Demise c. Symbol Grendel Wishes To Represent III. Green Knight’s Ways a. The Challenge at Hand b. Results of the Conflict c. Sir Gawain’s Repentance of Shame IV. The Unseen Pattern a. Beowulf’s Lesson? b. Sir Gawain’s Lesson c. Who gets more out of the Journey? V. Conclusion Russ Williams 19 September 2015 Dr. Daniel Pigg Out of Class Essay #1 Grendel and the Green Knight After going over the tales and the moral of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and the herculean tales of the legendary Beowulf, the process of discovering brought out the interesting characteristics and actions of the antagonists of both of these tales. These antagonists seemed to have at least some form or way of trying to make a point or statement to a group of people or just one person. For example, in Beowulf, Grendel was hinted at being related to the devil after his bloodthirsty hunt of trying to eliminate the people of Heorot and even trying to kill Beowulf after being lead to all the noise from his nest. In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, the Green Knight had put Sir Gawain to the test to see if Sir Gawain was the â€Å"worthy† knight that King Arthur and the Round Table had made Gawain to be after he was able to chop off the Green Knight’s head in front of everyone during Christmas time. This essay will talk about what they have in c ommon and what they represent in theirShow MoreRelatedComparing Beowulf And Sir Gawain And The Green Knight Essay1555 Words   |  7 Pagesone value loyalty? Among the many values of the Anglo-Saxons, such as bravery, truth, and honor, above them all stands loyalty. Through an archetypal analysis, one may view how two major works of the Middle Ages, Beowulf and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, both reflect attributes of loyalty, specifically the testing of one’s loyalty and the consequences of disloyalty, which reflect the behavior and values shared by the Anglo-Saxons and the people of the Late Medieval era. When analyzing loyaltyRead MoreChildrens Literature13219 Words   |  53 Pagesand his hold on life in a world without family or more than term-time security; and we know that Voldemort himself was abandoned by his Muggle father in childhood when he found out that his wife was a witch. But he is also the alien, the monster Grendel outside the feast hall, the creature of night whose one thought is to let me rip you ... let me tear you ... let me kill you ... (Chamber, 92). Voldemort is the culmination of the portrayals of malice and threat to identity in earlier 1990s fantasy

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Touch of Evil Abuse of Power and Corruption in the Police Force Free Essays

James Temple Coms 356 Paper on Lighting I believe an important theme of Touch of Evil is the abuse of power and corruption in the police force. The film follows detectives as they try and find out who planted dynamite in a car which blew up. Detective Hank Quinlan shows up on the scene and has a feeling that the dynamite was planted by someone on the Mexican side. We will write a custom essay sample on Touch of Evil: Abuse of Power and Corruption in the Police Force or any similar topic only for you Order Now Detective Quinlan is a corrupt detective who does anything he can to drag evil doers to justice. His fellow officers awe him and his reputation to take justice into his own hands. Detective Quinlan can be both a good and evil guy. In the first example, Chiaroscuro lighting is used to darken Hank Quinlan’s face. This lighting shows how Quinlan is an evil individual who gets what he wants. This lighting is of low key since it is hard to see Quinlan’s face. To the right of Quinlan is one of the Mexican mob men and Susan with light shining on them coming from the right side of the screen. This light is of high key and high contrast. The light is shining on Susan as if this scene wants to show us how she is good and that she is just an innocent bystander. On the face of Hank is a stern look which gives him a sinister appearance that he’ll do anything to obtain justice. The Mexican mob guy is standing there with his hands up with light shining all over him as to say that he is a good guy and hasn’t done anything wrong but we know that this isn’t the case. In the second example, we have light shining on Hank Quinlan and Ramon Vargas. Here the lighting is of high key and high contrast. This is picture is when Quinlan tells Vargas that the dynamite has been in this box, but Vargas tells him that he just looked in the box and it wasn’t in there before. Vargas’ face is lit showing that he is of innocence and is a good guy. On the other hand Quinlan has his hat on which cast a little shadow over his eyes showing that he is evil. We can tell that Quinlan is up to something and that it was most likely him who put the dynamite stick in the box. Detective Quinlan has a lot of power and he uses it to the fullest. [pic] Example 1 [pic] Example 2 How to cite Touch of Evil: Abuse of Power and Corruption in the Police Force, Essay examples

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

The Merchant of Venice, Shylock Victim or Villain Essay Example

The Merchant of Venice, Shylock: Victim or Villain Paper The Merchant of Venice was probably written in either 1596 or 1597, after such early plays such as Romeo Juliet and Richard III but before the great tragedies of Shakespeares later life. The Merchant of Venice is an intriguing drama of love greed, and in some aspects racism but most importantly revenge. The cross dressing heroine and the Italian location makes it similar to earlier comedies but the characters of Shylock and Portia Shakespeares first great heroine, elevate it to the first rank of his plays. (Internet: www.shakespeare.com) Shylock is a Jewish moneylender in Venice; the Christians have abused him in his city, especially Antonio and his friends. I think that this is partly because Shylock is the only Jew in most of the city. His quest for revenge consumes his cunning one-track mind. (Internet) This makes the audience think whether he is a victim? Or whether he is a villain? In my essay I will be looking for this and supporting my ideas with evidence from quotes from the text. Shylock is a very different character from the others because of his religion, beliefs, and the way he dresses and other characters like Antonio think that he is a target for them to pick on and be nasty and mean to him because of his creed, Shylock tells us some of the names Antonio has called him and also the way he has treated him: You call me a misbeliever (1:3:33:108 We will write a custom essay sample on The Merchant of Venice, Shylock: Victim or Villain specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Merchant of Venice, Shylock: Victim or Villain specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Merchant of Venice, Shylock: Victim or Villain specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Cut dog-throat (1:3:33108) Spit upon my Jewish gabardine (1:3:33:109) These three quotes are a real insult to Shylock by the first quote Antonio cannot judge how much Shylock believes in his religion, or if he even follows the rules of his religion that is up to Shylock to decide. What is even worse is that Antonio refers to him as a dog this has terribly offended Shylock because Jews think that dogs are not sacred animals and that the devil lives inside them. Also Antonio refers to his clothing and the way he dresses and Antonio disrespects the way Shylock dresses because none of the Christians wear a gabardine. This makes me feel sorry for Shylock for the reason that he doesnt deserve to be treated in that way. The worst thing is that it is not only verbal racism but also physical too. The audience during Shakespeares time would have found the spitting quite hilarious since they would not witness someone spewing on their enemy. Later on in the play you will find that it is not only Antonio that is felonious towards Shylock it is also Lorenzo: Faithless Jew (2:4:63:37) Lorenzo refers to Shylock as if he is not a devoted Jew. We can interpret this in two different ways, firstly being just that he doesnt have faith in his religion so that is why he is a Faithless Jew. Or others could interpret it by thinking how can he be a Jew if he doesnt have faith or if he doesnt believe in his religion how can he be a Jew. Shakespeare has put to opposite words faithless and Jew in one sentence in the above quote, this is called an oxymoron, Shakespeare does this to make the sentence stand out and also to make us feel sorry for Shylock; that is exactly what it does do it makes us sympathise for Shy lock and it makes us think why does he have to go through all of this, but that is how nows audience would feel but back in Shakespearian time when the play was written and performed the audience would have loved this sort of thing they would almost certainly find this humorous and pleasant, but then again they only thought of it as a play. In these four above quotes I think that Shylock is a victim because of the way Antonio and Lorenzo have treated him. It makes me wonder what do they achieve by making fun of other peoples religion and lifestyle? Why do they do this? Do they find it fun? But what they dont think about is how the other person feels, maybe Shylock should treat them the same way they have treated him so that they would know what it is like to be treated in that way. When this play was acted out in front of a Shakespearian audience they would have hissed, mocked and booed him as soon as he stepped foot on the stage they had no consideration what so ever but in this day and age nobody does this because it is a sign of racism. Antonio asks Shylock for 3000 Ducats to lend to Bassanio, Bassanio needs this money to impress Portia she is the girl he has fallen in love with it was love at first sight basically. Portia comes from a rich and wealthy family her father has just died and in his will he has written that Portia must marry who ever chooses the right casket. So anyway Bassanio is not rich and nor does he come from a rich or wealthy family so this is why he needs the money. Shylock agrees to lend the money to him as long as he has a guarantee; in this case his guarantor is Antonio this means that if Bassanio cannot pay the money back on time then Antonio must pay the money back to Shylock but as we all know Shakespeares plays always have a twist of some sort in them heres the twist to this one, well if both Antonio and Bassanio do not pay the money back on time Shylocks guarantee is that: An equal pound of your fair fleshin whatever part of your body pleaseth me (1:3:147-148) The first impression that I get from this quote is that can Shylock actually be this mean to Antonio, okay, Antonio has been mean to him but there is no need to go this far and put someones life at risk. The least he could do is give Antonio a chance if he doesnt pay the money back in time, anyway Antonio knows that his ships will come back from sea a day before he owes the money to Shylock. So he also agrees to the bond, Bassanio gives Antonia a chance to back out but Antonio says but not in so many words, no its alright I am your friend and what are friends for, and he agrees to the bond. Well I suppose other people would say it is because Antonio is calling him names and offending his religion so why should Shylock have to put up with it because Antonio isnt respectful just because Shylock is the only Jew in the trade. So Shylock thinks that this is his opportunity to get his own back on Antonio for every thing he has ever said or done to Shylock. This makes Shylock look like a villain because if you think about films the baddies always have to get their own back on the victim and this is what is happening here. Also if you have noticed that Antonio and Shylock have switched roles of victim and villain. Then again some people might think that he is only doing this because Antonio has called him names so why cant he go through the same pain as Shylock, they might also say that it is not fair if Antonio can bully Shylock and Shylock copes with it and doesnt do anything about it and Antonio gets away with it, so Shylock should get his back and make him suffer. Bassanio Antonio and Shylock all sign and agree with the bond. What makes things worse is the fact that he is the only person in the trade who charges interest but in this case he is not charging interest because Antonio says to him it is not in the nature of friendship to take interest on money lent to a friend so Shylock says well I am your friend and the quote he uses to tell Antonio that he is not going to charge interest is: And take no doit of usance for my money (1:3:35:136-137) So now Shylock is being all nice again and not charging interest but this might be because of the bond that they have agreed to, Shylock has probably already thought about it before and he almost certainly thinks that the guarantee is a substitute for the bond Shakespeare also uses a simile which Antonio speaks about, it is referring to Shylock as villain:- An evil soul producing holy witness is like a villain with a smiling cheek This simile I think is very effective because Antonio is saying that Shylock is evil, but on the outside to everyone else he seems nice, helpful and good. He shows that he is a holy person and doing good for people, maybe praying, he could be a priest, for example but his intentions are not so good, portraying something different, maybe the way he acts on the outside but deep down inside he is evil. He is Evil by doing bad deeds; he only cares about himself and his money, as we will find out. Later in the play Jessica who is Shylocks daughter is planning to run away from home with Lancelot. Lancelot used to be Shylocks worker but he quit to go and work with Bassanio but we dont know why. Was it because Shylock was mean? Who knows, but I think that if his own daughter wants to run away from home, then there must be something wrong with him. Was he mistreating her? Was he ashamed of her? Was he neglecting her? To be ashamed to be fathers child (2:3:17) I am sorry thou Wilt leave my father (2:3:1) There must definitely be something wrong with Shylock, because Jessica is ashamed to be his daughter. She is also planning to change her religion to Christianity because she loves Lancelot so much and wants to marry him. Jessica wants to have less to do with Shylock as possible, and wants to end the relationship with him. Become a Christian and thy loving wife (2:3:21) But later on Jessica tells Bassanio, Salerio, and Portia that she overheard her father talking to Tubal and Chus who are also Jewish, he was telling them how much he would prefer Antonios flesh than twenty times as much sum of money owed. Rather have Antonios flesh than twenty times the value of the sum he did owe him (3:2:287-288) This is really showing that he is a villain, but even if he said it the other way round, people would still think that he is greedy and all he ever cares about is his money and how much wealth he possesses. The 3 months have ended and Antonio hasnt succeeded to pay back Shylocks money, because all his ships have been shipwrecked whilst out at sea. Bassanio receives a letter from Antonio; he sends his sends his final regards, saying how happy he was that Bassanio and Portia have at last got engaged. He then goes on and says his final farewells, at this point Bassanio feels sorry for him and he thinks that this is all his fault: The paper as the body of my friends (3:2:264) This quote is saying that a pathetic little bond written on some paper is costing him Antonios life. This quote is also a metaphor because how can a bit of paper be your body it cant, it is impossible, and Shakespeare uses this to express that the quote means that the paper is responsible for Antonios life. Shylock has been to the government to change the law because he wants his rights also before this scene he has a bit of anger to let out because Salerio says to Shylock oh if Antonio doesnt pay you back the money youre not really going to take a pound of his flesh are you? This really set the spark to the fire: Feed my revenge (3:1:50) Shakespeare has used some personification because you cant really feed revenge can you? This means that Shylock has been through a lot and now he wants to get his revenge, the word feed meaning like without food nobody can live so he is saying it keeps Antonio alive to pick on people this makes him look as if he is a villain. He laughed at my loses mocked at my gains scorned my nation, thwarted my bargains. (3:1:51-53) This is a very strong part of his speech because he is once again telling us how Antonio has been treating Shylock and as we can see he has been racist, insulting he has teased and has humiliated him, so in a way I think that Shylock has a right to do something to Antonio but I wouldnt go as far as killing him it is not even worth it. Cooled my friends, heated mine enemies (3:1:53-54) Shakespeare has used two types of technique in one sentence firstly he has used an oxymoron which means he uses the two words with opposite meanings, in this quote the oxymorons are Cooled and Heated. Secondly being a metaphor, because you cant really cool or heat friends and enemies. It is like saying you have even turned people who are my friends against me, you have been spreading rumours about me. Whats his reason? I am a Jew. (3:1:54) This is a rhetorical question, which is a question but instead of someone else answering it you answer it yourself, Shakespeare has used this several times in this speech, it makes the speech more effective and emotive and it made me feel sorry for Shylock because he is so angry at Antonio and then Salerio has to just go and stir it up even more, it also makes us the audience think what he is going through and the next few lines are very strong and powerful. When I saw the second version of this specific speech he said it with anger and rage and you could tell that he was hurt inside because of his body language and the way he moved his hands you could tell that he was frustrated, the audience then wouldnt have taken much notice of his feelings they would most probably be laughing. Hath not a Jews hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? (3:1:54-56) In this quote Shylock is trying to express his feelings he is saying although I am a Jew I still have a heart and some soft touches and I am just as sensitive just like everyone else, I am no different, I am still made up of the same organs as you. These are rhetorical devices that Shakespeare has used to emphasize the point. If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? (3:1:60-62) The word prick I think resembles hurtful words because it then goes on to talk about bleeding this is symbolising pain and how upset he his. Shylock then compares this with having fun, which is when you laugh, and he compares the name calling to poison and how after a while when you have been teased and so much you just get sick of it and then you try to ignore it but what is worse you sometimes wish that you werent alive. Now Shylock ask some rhetorical questions: If a Jew wrong a Christian what is his humility? Revenge (3:1:64-65) If a Christian wrong a Jew what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why revenge (3:1:65-67) In this speech of Shylock, Shakespeare has used a lot of techniques this is all done to make more effective and the way he has sometimes used If and You which are second person pronouns that directly address to the audience or it could be that he is talking about a group of Jews. I think that Shakespeare was talking to the audience because it makes them more involved and they would probably cheer, boo or hiss. The audience during Shakespeares time would have been a lot more different than to days audiences, the audience today are more considerate and sympathetic, where as Shakespeares audiences wouldnt have been sympathetic towards Shylock instead they would laugh, snigger and giggle at him. I think that this makes Shylock look like a victim and it makes us feel sorry for him, because the way Shakespeare has worded Shylocks speech, but then again some people might think that the last line spoils it and makes him look like a villain: The villainy you teach me I will execute. (3:1:67-68) The reason why Shylock takes Antonio to court is because he wants his bond and he doesnt want to break his promise. In the version of the court that we watched Shylock looked very plain and he was dressed scruffily he didnt look that religious neither. He doesnt look aggressive in fact he looks very humble. The duke is being bias towards Shylock: Which is a pound of this poor merchants flesh (4:1:21) The first time Shylock speaks in the court scene is when he is very proud of himself and he seems as though he is a victim but he is a villain, looks can be very deceiving. He says that he is going to stick to the bond and he will not change his mind. He could change his mind if he wanted to but he is just being stubborn. Antonio is still offending Shylock in court as well because he refers to him as a Jew His Jewish heart (4:1:80) Shylock says: The pound of flesh which I demand of himtis mine and I will have it (4:1:99-100) When Shylock finishes saying this line he begins to sharpen his knife on his shoe, to get ready to cut Antonios flesh, and he look very sly and evil as he does this. Nerissa and Portia enter the courtroom looking like men; this is an example of dramatic irony this when the audience knows something that most or all of the characters dont know. In this case the audience knows that Nerissa and Portia are dressed up as a men but the characters think that they are men not Nerissa and Portia. Gratiano calls Shylock: Inexecrable dog (4:1:128) This is an another insult referring to his religion, but at this point I dont particularly feel sorry for him because it is his own fault now, he could have broken the bond and ended it all but he wanted to get his own back on Antonio. Portia refers to Christian faith and tells Shylock that if he is merciful to other people the will be merciful to him and so will God. The deeds of mercy (4:1:201) Later in the scene Portia reads out points from the bond and says that the piece of flesh has to be taken out nearest to the heart. This makes Shylock look like a villain and we feel more sympathetic for Antonio because he is probably going to die unless Shylock breaks the deal. Shylock has to take exactly a pound of flesh in one go no more and no less: nor cut thou less nor more But just a pound of flesh (4:1:325) Portia asks Shylock whether or not she is allowed to get a surgeon to look after Antonios wound after you have cut him. Shylock reads through the bond and says no it is not in the bond so you cannot have a surgeon. tis not in the bond (4:1:261) Portia is a really determined girl she is not going to give up until Antonio is free. She has got a question ready to argue every point. Later she argues the fact that in the bond it doesnt mention a word about blood, so Portia refers to this and says to Shylock that in the bond there is nothing about blood, so therefore you must take a pound of flesh out of Antonio without even a drop of blood. This bond doth give thee here no jot of blood , the words expressly are a pound of flesh' (4:1:304-305) After hearing this Shylock begins to change his mind because it is impossible to take out flesh without blood so he takes up the offer for 9000 Ducats and he will let Antonio live: I take this offer then; pay the bond thrice and let the Christian go. (4:1:318 -319) So now at least Antonio is off the hook but what is Shylocks punishment for breaking the bond: for one half goods I am content the other half in use to render it upon his death This is what Antonio says so Antonio gets half of what Shylock already has and the other half will go to his daughter and on his funeral. He has to become a Christian everything that is under his possession shall go to Lancelot his son in law and his daughter: He presently become a Christian (4:1:386) Allpossessed unto his son Lorenzo and his daughter (4:1:385-389) In the version of the play we watched when Shylock exits the stage permanently you hear a long wail and at this point I felt so sorry for Shylock because he has to change his religion, he has given everything that he has got away either to Antonio the government or his daughter even his house, he has got now where to go or live this is very upsetting and at the end of the play he is a victim. I dont think that Shakespeare is racist but the audience during his time were because they were not as understanding as us. They thought that, yeah, he is a different religion we wont talk to him he seems a bit weird or he is not the same as us. But today we are willing to bring this issues out into the world an debate or discuss them even though some people are still racist but that will always will be there it is not going to go away in a day or two it depends on the person. If I was a director of the play I would make Shylock look more religious and make him into a person who stands up for himself and who cares for people, he would be a very strong character but I would still include he issues of religion and racism because it makes the play more realistic and it shows people that every one was equal. As for Antonio I would make him a lot more caring but at the same time sly and evil but as well as that he would have to face a big change in his lifestyle as well as Shylock. In some parts of this play I thought that Shylock was a victim and in others I thought that he was a villain because of the bond but if that werent in it then he wouldnt be a villain because Antonio would always be abusing him and picking on him. Antonio was always switching places with Shylock because sometimes when Shylock was a victim he would be a villain and when he was a villain Shylock would be a victim.

Thursday, March 19, 2020

Tribal inference essay

Tribal inference essay The language of a people is mostly a representation of how the respective people view their world and interpret their experiences. The structure of a people’s language can therefore be used to make inferences about their unique ways of life therefore providing a means by which we can reconstruct the life of a civilization. In this paper, I shall attempt to reconstruct the life of a lost tribe, the Amiable people. The Amiable people civilization has just recently been discovered by archaeologists. The reconstruction efforts shall be achieved by analyzing some words that linguistic anthropologists have highlighted as characterizing the societys language. I shall use these linguistic characteristics as a basis for making plausible claims about the tribe. Although it is impossible to pinpoint the exact geographical location that the Amiables lived, their language sheds some light as to the nature of the land that the tribe may have occupied. It is probable that the tribe lived in a plain or prairie region. Their words for describing the terrain of their land are limited to absolutely flat, rolling, and slightly hilly. It is therefore quite unlikely that the tribe lived in a mountainous region as their language does not accommodate words for such terrains.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Tribal inference essay specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The fact that the tribe also has a dozen terms for grains including eight for wheat alone also suggests that the tribe was extensively involved in wheat farming. This further reinforces the possibility that the tribe was from the plains and prairies since these are the areas in which wheat farming thrives. It is possible that the Amiable’s lived deep inland as their language lacks a term for â€Å"ocean.† Their lack of a word for â€Å"fish† also hints that they did not live near any large water bodies as it is inconceivable that any costal tribe would fail to engage in fishing as an economic activity. From the Amiables language, we find that they had several words for precipitation with most translating as rain and only one meaning snow. One might suggest from these that their climate was characterized by regular rains and snow falls were only periodically phenomena. The Amiables language offers us some valuable insight into the type of foods that the tribe may have consumed. The prevalence of words for grain in their language might be a possible indication that grains, and particularly wheat, was the staple food of the people. In as much as their language gives a positive indication that these people reared animals such as cows, pigs and sheep, there is no indication that the tribe utilized these animals for meat or hide. For example, their language lacks words that translate to â€Å"beef,† â€Å"pork,† â€Å"veal,† or â€Å"leather,† despite having words such as â€Å"cow,† â€Å"pig,† and â€Å"sheep.† This could be an indication that the Amiables did not kill the animals for food or hide. It is therefore a plausible assumption that the Amiables were a vegetarian people. However, there it is possible that the Amiables might have used the animals for other means that did not involve killing them e.g. cows for their milk or sheep for their wool since it would be preposterous to concede that they kept these animals as pets. All this is however speculative as we do not have a full inventory of their language. From the language of the Amiables, it can be proposed that great value was placed on the family. The word woman is synonymous with wife and mother to the Amiables and the term man is synonymous with husband and father.Advertising Looking for essay on anthropology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More It is therefore evident that to the tribe, the woman was primarily viewed as a wife and mother to the children and the man as a husband and father of the children. These fusions of the terms (man and woman) with terms related to a family life suggest that the Amiables placed great value on the family which was made up of a man and a woman. The language of the Amiables contains many terms for children some of which translate as wise small one innocent leader and little stargazer. One can conclude from this that children were highly regarded by the Amiables. This supposition is further advanced by the fact that the Amiables had seven terms to describe the stages of life up to puberty (which marks the end of childhood) and only one term to describe life henceforth to death. It can therefore be speculated that the family of these tribe was centered on the children. Sex was primarily used for procreation and their term for sex translates as to plant a wise one, therefore underscoring the procreative role that sex played to the Amiables as well as the reverence with which children were held. The Amiable tribe was a literate and educated people. This can be deduced from the many words that the tribe had for books which implies a great exposure by the tribe to books. It is therefore possible that great emphasis was placed on a formal education that resulted in the ability to read by the population. One might also concede that this people were well cultured and had an inclination to the artistic works. For example, the Amiables had nine words for artist which suggests that there were a number of people engaged in arts. The presence of four words for theatre also suggests that there were numerous artistic presentations such as plays and songs that the general population went to watch in the theatres. The social construct of the Amiables was based on communal leadership. This is evident from the fact that the tribe had several words for leaders but all in the plural form. This suggest that in as much as the tribe relied on strong and effective leadership to steer the tribe to success, the leadership role was not placed in the hands of one person but rather collective responsibility was encouraged. The Amiables were also non-violent as can be illustrated from the lack of a word for violent conflict or war in their language. They preferred to resolve their conflicts diplomatically instead of engaging in war. For this reason, the people who could act as reconcilers were held in high esteem as is suggested from the Amiables term of praise translating to peacemaker and conciliator.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Tribal inference essay specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This paper set out to reconstruct the life of the Amiable civilization by analyzing their language. It has been discovered that the Amiables were a peaceful and learned people who placed high value on family and their children. What is admirable about this people to me is that they realized that leadership in the hands of one person can corrupt and therefore took to collective leadership. Their cultural standards were also impressive as is suggested by their artistry. However, the data provided is not sufficient to conclusively reconstruct interesting facets of their lives such as their economic activities and exactly how the tribe resolved its disputes diplomatically thus averting the use of violence. Such information would be precious to our civilization which can no doubt borrow a lot from the Amiables.

Tuesday, March 3, 2020

MBA Essay Editing

MBA Essay Editing MBA Essay Editing MBA Essay Editing To get an MBA admission you need to stand out from the crowd as you impress the admissions committee with your wellrounded personality and ability to multi-task. But the last and most important step consists of MBA Essay Editing. While doing some MBA Essay Editing read through your essay to gauge if it exhibits some clear thinking. Clarity of thought will lead to clarity of purpose so put down: Your goals Your attributes through which you can achieve them The things that motivate you in life Once you have written your essay you still have the vital step of MBA Essay Editing to go through before your essay can reach the completed and polished stage. This is when you need to check and recheck the ideas and text for any flaws as well as mistakes. What is MBA Essay Editing? Editing consists of checking what you have written for Grammar and Spelling mistakes. You can do this by using a ruler under each line to assure accuracy. These are the things to watch out for while MBA Essay Editing: Have I spelled all the words correctly? Is my grammar flawless? Have I read and reread my essay till I am completely satisfied with the outcome? Are the subjects and verbs in agreement with each other? Does every sentence have a subject? Have I stuck in the right tense? Is there a logical flow and a proper progression of ideas? Are my ideas and thoughts clearly written and easy to follow? Do I have a strong thesis statement that is validated by the rest of the essay and re-enforced in the conclusion? Does my essay have a beginning, middle and an end: Will my essay hold the attention of my reader? MBA Essay Editing Help Proof reading and MBA Essay Editing can seem like a chore but it can make all the difference to the quality of your essay. You may have written a brilliant paper but clumsy English and faulty spellings can just about ruin it. One thing you have to keep in mind though is NOT to edit when you are fatigued. Always take a break after writing your paper and then start on the editing stage when you are refreshed. Also, remember to use spell-check as a part of your editing process-but remember not to rely on it 100% since even spell-checks can go wrong sometimes and may not show up a spelling error even when there is one. After careful planning and MBA Essay Editing you are bound to get the grades that you are looking for. Read also: Assignments Online Writing English Coursework Sociology Coursework Help Religious Coursework Religion Coursework